Provision gap review
Review of the EHCP and the practical picture to identify where provision is missing, diluted, inconsistent or ineffective in delivery.
Navigate SEND helps families and professionals where agreed EHCP provision is not being delivered, is inconsistent, or is failing to meet need in practice.
This service is designed for situations where the plan may look right on paper, but the lived reality is different: support is missing, unclear, partial, inconsistent, or not having the effect it should because it is not being implemented properly.
Some of the most difficult SEND cases are not about getting a plan in the first place, but about what happens when the plan exists and the agreed provision is still not being delivered properly.
This service helps bring structure to that stage. We support the process by clarifying what provision is supposed to be happening, what is happening in practice, where the gap lies, and what the strongest next step may now be.
Review of the EHCP and the practical picture to identify where provision is missing, diluted, inconsistent or ineffective in delivery.
Clarifying what support should be happening, what is actually happening, and which issues are most important to evidence.
Helping shape a clearer account of the problem and the strongest route for what needs to happen next.
Reviewing the available reports, educational information and lived experience evidence that supports the case picture.
Support with structuring provision-related correspondence, requests or next-step materials where agreed.
Clarifying whether the case now points towards amendment, local authority request work, annual review or ongoing strategic advisory support.
Parents and carers who believe the agreed support in the EHCP is not being made properly in reality.
Professionals who need a clearer route for analysing and progressing a provision failure issue.
Situations where the gap between written provision and actual delivery is causing distress, delay or educational harm.
You explain what provision should be happening, what is happening in reality, and what concerns are now most urgent.
We review the case at a high level and identify whether this is the right service pathway.
Where appropriate, we clarify the provision issues, evidence picture and likely next-step route.
The gap between the EHCP and actual delivery is analysed more clearly and the next-step materials are structured where agreed.
The service concludes with a clearer route for what should now happen to address the provision issue.
If the case cuts across more than one stage, get in touch and we can help identify the strongest entry point.
The existing plan so the agreed provision can be reviewed in context.
What is happening in practice, including timetables, arrangements or explanations already given.
Any reports or records that help explain why the specified provision matters and what happens when it is absent.
Any clear account of what has been missed, delayed, reduced or inconsistently delivered.
If the case is linked to a nearby stage in the SEND journey, these services may also be relevant:
It means support written into the EHCP is not being provided in practice, is inconsistent, is unclear in reality, or is being delivered in a way that does not meet the child or young person's needs.
Yes. This service is relevant where provision on paper and provision in practice appear misaligned, inconsistent or insufficient.
Usually this service is most relevant where provision is already specified and the problem is that it is not being made properly in practice.
Yes. Provision issues often connect to amendment work, annual review, requests to the local authority or ongoing strategic advisory support.
If the written plan and real-world delivery no longer match, get in touch and we can help clarify the strongest next steps.